On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Phoenix Kiula <phoenix.kiula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks Merlin, Scott. > > First, yes, I can increase maintenance_work_memory. I have 8GB RAM in > total, and sure, I can dedicate 1GB of it to PG. Currently PG is the > most intensive software here. If we're talking maintenance work mem, then you might want to set it for a single connection. set maintenance_work_mem='1000MB'; reindex yada yada; etc. So it's not global, just local. > Second, how can I check if there are other things going on in the > database while i REINDEX? Maybe some kind of vacuum is going on, but > isn't that supposed to wait while REINDEX is happening for at least > this table? OK, my main point has been that if autovacuum is running well enough, then you don't need reindex, and if you are running it it's a maintenance thing you shouldn't have to schedule all the time, but only run until you get autovac tuned up enough to handle your db during the day. however, I know sometimes you're stuck with what you're stuck with. You can see what else is running with the pg_stats_activity view, which will show you all running queries. That and iotop cna show you which processes are chewing up how much IO. The other pg_stat_* tables can get you a good idea of what's happening to your tables in the database. iostat and vmstat can give you an idea how much IO bandwidth you're using. If a vacuum starts after the reindex it will either wait or abort and not get in the way. If a vacuum is already running I'm not sure if it will get killed or not. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
