Marti Raudsepp <marti@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Greg Smith <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Kevin and I both suggested a "fast plus timeout then immediate" >> behavior is what many users seem to want. > Seems that a better solution would be implementing a new -m option > that does this transparently? Maybe. Another option might be to use -t or some new switch (or -t in combination with some new switch) as a time limit before escalating to the next shutdown mode. -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
