2011/2/4 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@xxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:i.e. a block number and a slot position within the block?
> Why do you expect such a invasive code changes? I know little about
> postgresql code layering, but what I propose (with changing delete to
> truncate) is:
> 1) Leave tuple addressing as it is now
Seems like you'd need <file,block,slot>.
So, each file still have it's fixed N blocks. And filenumber is still blocknumber / N.
--
Best regards,
Vitalii Tymchyshyn