Dan Birken wrote:
The 3405 and 4800 are two of Adaptec's older cards with only 128MB of cache on them. Those are on the slow side compared to the others listed.
The LSI cards are some of the most popular and known to work well with PostgreSQL ones around. I've recently tested a system based on the 5405, and as much as I've hated Adaptec controllers in the past I have to admit this latest line from them is pretty solid. My own benchmarks and the others I've seen suggest it's easily capable of keeping up with the LSI and Areca controllers Adaptec used to be seriously outrun by. See http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/adaptec-serial-controllers,1806-14.html for example. The "Z" variations use their "Zero-Maintenance Cache" instead of a standard battery-backup unit; that's a small amount of flash memory and a supercap, similar to the good caches on SSD: http://www.adaptec.com/NR/rdonlyres/7FD8C372-8231-4727-B12B-5ABF79D9325C/0/6514_Series5Z_1_7.pdf 5405 has 256MB of cache, the others 512MB. The 5405 and 5805 models do have a known problem where they overheat if you don't have enough cooling in the server box, with the 5805 seeming to be the bigger source of such issues. See the reviews at http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816103099 for example. Scott Marlowe was griping recently about a similar issue in some of the LSI models, too. I suspect it's a problem impacting several of the larger RAID cards that use the big Intel IOP processors for their RAID computations, given that's the part with the heatsink on it. Quick summary: avoid the Adaptec 3405 and 4800. Rest are decent cards. Just make sure you monitor the temperatures in your case (and the card too if arcconf lets you, I haven't checked for that yet) if you end up with a 5405/5805. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us "PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books |
