Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Um, that looks like 90 usec per row, not msec. Oh, right. Well, having to do a random heap access for 1% of the rows would pretty much explain the run time, then. -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
