On 1/13/2011 4:42 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Robert Haas<robertmhaas@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Jon Nelson<jnelson+pgsql@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I still think that having UNION do de-duplication of each contributory
relation is a beneficial thing to consider -- especially if postgresql
thinks the uniqueness is not very high.
This might be worth a TODO.
I don't believe there is any case where hashing each individual relation
is a win compared to hashing them all together. If the optimizer were
smart enough to be considering the situation as a whole, it would always
do the latter.
You might be right, but I'm not sure. Suppose that there are 100
inheritance children, and each has 10,000 distinct values, but none of
them are common between the tables. In that situation, de-duplicating
each individual table requires a hash table that can hold 10,000
entries. But deduplicating everything at once requires a hash table
that can hold 1,000,000 entries.
Or am I all wet?
Yeah, I'm all wet, because you'd still have to re-de-duplicate at the
end. But then why did the OP get a speedup? *scratches head*
Because it all fix it memory and didnt swap to disk?
-Andy
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
