Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 20:40, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The latter choice is the one that requires testing to prove that it is the proper and preferred default from the performance and data reliability POV.
>
> And, in fact, the game plan is to do that testing and see which default
> we want. ÂI think it's premature to argue further about this until we
> have some test results.

Who will be doing that testing? You said you're relying on Greg Smith
to manage the testing, but he's obviously uninterested, so it seems
unlikely that this will go anywhere.

I posted my results with the simple INSERT test, but nobody cared. I
could do some pgbench runs, but I have no idea what parameters would
give useful results.

Meanwhile, PostgreSQL performance is regressing and there's still no
evidence that open_datasync is any safer.

Regards,
Marti

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux