Re: postmaster consuming /lots/ of memory with hash aggregate. why?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/11/12 Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> look on EXPLAIN ANALYZE command. Probably your statistic are out, and
>> then planner can be confused. EXPLAIN ANALYZE statement show it.
>
> As I noted earlier, I did set statistics to 1000 an re-ran vacuum
> analyze and the plan did not change.

this change can do nothing. this is default in config. did you use
ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN SET STATISTIC = ... ? and ANALYZE

>
> What other diagnostics can I provide? This still doesn't answer the
> 40000 row question, though. It seems absurd to me that the planner
> would give up and just use 40000 rows (0.02 percent of the actual
> result).
>

there can be some not well supported operation, then planner use a
some % from rows without statistic based estimation

Pavel
> --
> Jon
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux