Hello do you use a VACUUM statement? Regards Pavel Stehule 2010/11/8 shaiju.ck <shaiju.ck@xxxxxxxxx>: > Hi, I have a table employee with 33 columns. The table have 200 records now. > Select * from employee takes 15 seconds to fetch the data!!! Which seems to > be very slow. But when I say select id,name from empoyee it executes in > 30ms. Same pefromance if I say select count(*) from emloyee. Why the query > is slow if I included all the columns in the table. As per my understanding > , number of columns should not be having a major impact on the query > performance. I have increased the shared_buffres to 1024MB, but no > improvement. I have noticed that the query "show shared_buffers" always show > 8MB.Why is this? Does it mean that changing the shared_buffers in config > file have no impact? Can anybody help? Shaiju > ________________________________ > View this message in context: Select * is very slow > Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance