Re: Major Linux performance regression; shouldn't we be worried about RHEL6?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 05 November 2010 21:15:20 Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
> 
> Domas (of Facebook/Wikipedia, MySQL geek) pointed me to this report:
> 
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_perf_regressions&n
I guess thats the O_DSYNC thingy.  See the "Defaulting wal_sync_method to 
fdatasync on Linux for 9.1?" (performance) and "Revert default wal_sync_method 
to fdatasync on Linux 2.6.33+" on hackers.

O_DSYNC got finally properly implemented on linux with 2.6.33 (and thus 2.6.32-
rc1).

> um=1 http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ext4_then_now&num=6
That one looks pretty uninteresting. Barriers are slower then no barriers. No 
surprise there.

Andres

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux