Marti Raudsepp <marti 'at' juffo.org> writes: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 13:11, Guillaume Cottenceau <gc@xxxxxx> wrote: >> Don't use PostgreSQL, just drop your data, you will end up with >> the same results and be even faster than any use of PostgreSQL. >> If anyone needs data, then just say you had data corruption, and >> that since 100% dataloss is accepted, then all's well. > > You're not helping. There are legitimate reasons for trading off > safety for performance. Cccepting 100% dataloss and datacorruption deserves a little reasoning, otherwise I'm afraid I'm right in suggesting it makes little difference to use PG or to drop data altogether. -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
