On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Mladen Gogala <mladen.gogala@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I was surprised because I expected array bind to produce better > results over the network than the row-by-row operations, yet it > didn't. Can anybody elaborate a bit? While all of the bulk-execute functions are likely to have implementations, they are not necessarily likely to actually be efficient implementations. I ran into this with DBD::ODBC a while back because DBD::ODBC implements execute_array() as "execute($_) foreach(@_)". DBD::Pg doesn't appear to implement execute_array() at all, so perhaps it's falling back on a similar default implementation in the superclass. I generally suspect this is a Perl problem rather than a Postgres problem, but can't say more without code. Maybe try pastebin if you're having email censorship issues. -Conor -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
