Hi Marti,
Thanks for your tips. i will try those.
I am on Solaris Sparc 5.10
Best Regards,
Divakar
From: Marti Raudsepp <marti@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Divakar Singh <dpsmails@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Mon, November 1, 2010 6:23:17 PM
Subject: Re: Insert performance with composite index
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 14:49, Divakar Singh <dpsmails@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am trying to tune my libpq program for insert performance.
> When I tried inserting 1M rows into a table with a Primary Key, it took
> almost 62 seconds.
> After adding a composite index of 2 columns, the performance degrades to 125
> seconds.
This sounds a lot like the bottleneck I was hitting. What Linux kernel
version are you running?
If it's 2.6.33 or later, see:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuning_Your_PostgreSQL_Server#wal_sync_method_wal_buffers
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-10/msg00602.php
Regards,
Marti
Thanks for your tips. i will try those.
I am on Solaris Sparc 5.10
Divakar
From: Marti Raudsepp <marti@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Divakar Singh <dpsmails@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Mon, November 1, 2010 6:23:17 PM
Subject: Re: Insert performance with composite index
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 14:49, Divakar Singh <dpsmails@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am trying to tune my libpq program for insert performance.
> When I tried inserting 1M rows into a table with a Primary Key, it took
> almost 62 seconds.
> After adding a composite index of 2 columns, the performance degrades to 125
> seconds.
This sounds a lot like the bottleneck I was hitting. What Linux kernel
version are you running?
If it's 2.6.33 or later, see:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuning_Your_PostgreSQL_Server#wal_sync_method_wal_buffers
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-10/msg00602.php
Regards,
Marti