Kenneth Marshall <ktm@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Just keeping the hope alive for faster compression. Is there any evidence that that's something we should worry about? I can't recall ever having seen a code profile that shows the pg_lzcompress.c code high enough to look like a bottleneck compared to other query costs. Now, the benefits of 2X or 3X space savings would be pretty obvious, but I've seen no evidence that we could easily achieve that either. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
