Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 21 October 2010 21:42:06 Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I assume we send a full 8k to the controller, and a failure during
> > that write is not registered as a write.
> 
> On what do you base that assumption?  I assume that we send a full
> 8K to the OS cache, and the file system writes disk sectors
> according to its own algorithm.  With either platters or BBU cache,
> the data is persisted on fsync; why do you see a risk with one but
> not the other?
At least on linux pages can certainly get written out in < 8kb batches if 
youre under memory pressure.

Andres



-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux