On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dimi Paun <dimi@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 16:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Hm, what ps options did you use? I'm having a hard time reproducing >>> your display format on Fedora 13 (procps-3.2.8-7.fc13.x86_64). > >> Sorry, it wasn't a ps output, it was a line from top(1). > > Oh, yeah, top typically doesn't give you the up-to-date process command > line. Next time try ps, or pg_stat_activity. Or use htop. it identifies all the basic postgresql processes by job, like logger process, writer process and so on. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
