Nikolai Zhubr <n-a-zhubr@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > So, "in (1, 2)" condition is not in Index Cond anymore! Why is that? How > can I push it back? It thinks the indexscan condition is sufficiently selective already. An = ANY condition like that will force multiple index searches, one for each of the OR'd possibilities, so it's far from "free" to add it to the index condition. The planner doesn't think it's worth it. Perhaps on your real query it is, but there's not much point in debating about the behavior on this toy table; without realistic table sizes and up-to-date stats it's impossible to say whether that choice is correct or not. > SELECT version(); > PostgreSQL 8.3.1, compiled by Visual C++ build 1400 You really, really, really ought to be running 8.3.something-newer. We didn't put out the last 11 8.3.x bugfix updates just because we didn't have anything better to do. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
