On 10/11/10 8:02 PM, Scott Carey wrote:
would give you a 1MB read-ahead. Also, consider XFS and its built-in defragmentation. I have found that a longer lived postgres DB will get extreme
file fragmentation over time and sequential scans end up mostly random. On-line file defrag helps tremendously.
We just had a corrupt table caused by an XFS online defrag. I'm scared
to use this again while the db is live. Has anyone else found this to
be safe? But, I can vouch for the fragmentation issue, it happens very
quickly in our system.
-Dan
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
