> [ shrug ... ] We do not promise that the current partitioning scheme
> scales to the number of partitions where this is likely to be an
> interesting concern.
Actually, you can demonstrate pretty significant response time delays on
only 50 partitions.
> We're talking "wasted effort on a dead-end situation". The time that
> would go into this would be much better spent on real partitioning.
That only applies if someone is working on "real partitioning". Is anyone?
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
