Tobias Brox <tobixen@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Well - I thought so, we have a logging script that logs the content of > the pg_locks table, it didn't log anything interesting but it may be a > problem with the script itself. It does an inner join on > pg_locks.relation = pg_class.oid but when I check now this join seems > to remove most of the rows in the pg_locks table. Does it make sense > at all to join pg_class with pg_locks? I will ask the sysadm to > change to an outer join as for now. There are lots of locks that are not tied to a specific table, so an inner join is definitely bad. You could use an outer join to annotate rows that do correspond to table locks, though. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
