On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Gaël Le Mignot <gael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > In my humble opinion, while it can sound interesting from a theorical > point of view to outloads some operations to the GPU, there is a huge > pratical problem in current world : databases which are big enough to > require such heavy optimization are usually runned on server hardware, > which very rarely have powerful GPU. That's changed recently: http://www.aberdeeninc.com/abcatg/GPUservers.htm > There may be a small target of computers having both GPU and heavy > database, but that sounds very exceptional to me, so investing effort > into it sounds a bit unjustified to me. I tend to agree. OTOH, imagine using a 400 core GPU for offloading stuff that isn't just a sort, like travelling salesman type problems. The beauty of if is, that with pgsql support dozens of scripting languages, you wouldn't have to build anything into pg's backends, you could just write it in a pl langauge. -- To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
