Peter Hussey <peter@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > My questions are still > 1) Does the planner have any component of cost calculations based on the > size of work_mem, Sure. > and if so why do those calculations seem to have so > little effect here? Since you haven't provided sufficient information to let someone else reproduce what you're seeing, it's pretty hard to say. It might have something to do with the particularly wide join key values you're using, but that's mere speculation based on the one tidbit you provided. There might be some other effect altogether that's making it do the wrong thing. > 2) Why is the setting of work_mem something left to the admin and/or > developer? Because we're not smart enough to find a way to avoid that. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
