Re: Testing Sandforce SSD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthew Wakeling wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010, Yeb Havinga wrote:
Graph of TPS at http://tinypic.com/r/b96aup/3 and latency at http://tinypic.com/r/x5e846/3

Does your latency graph really have milliseconds as the y axis?
Yes
If so, this device is really slow - some requests have a latency of more than a second!
I try to just give the facts. Please remember that particular graphs are from a read/write pgbench run on a bigger than RAM database that ran for some time (so with checkpoints), on a *single* $435 50GB drive without BBU raid controller. Also, this is a picture with a few million points: the ones above 200ms are perhaps a hundred and hence make up a very small fraction.

So far I'm pretty impressed with this drive. Lets be fair to OCZ and the SandForce guys and do not shoot from the hip things like "really slow", without that being backed by a graphed pgbench run together with it's cost, so we can compare numbers with numbers.

regards,
Yeb Havinga


--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux