On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Ranga Gopalan <ranga_gopalan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It seems that this is an issue faced by others as well - Please see this > link: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2236776/efficient-querying-of-multi-partition-postgres-table > > Is this a known bug? Is this something that someone is working on or is > there a known work around? I think that we know this problem exists, but I'm not aware anyone is working on fixing it. There is a "Merge Append" patch floating around out there that I think might help with this, but AFAICS it was last updated on July 5, 2009, and still needed some more work at that time. Since this is an all-volunteer effort, complicated problems like this don't always get fixed as fast as we'd like; most of us have to spend most of our time on whatever it is that our employer pays us to do. Of course if you're in a position to sponsor a developer there are a number of companies that will be happy to work with you. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
