On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> The largest consequence I can see at the moment is that when I get a >> full vacuum (for preventing transaction-id wraparound) it would be > > I assume you mean the automatic database wide vacuum. I don't think > 8.4 and above need that anymore. I thnk 8.3 does that too, but I'm > not 100% sure. 8.4 (and 9.0) do still need to do vacuums to freeze tuples before transaction ID wraparound occurs. This is not to be confused with VACUUM FULL, which is something else altogether. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
