Re: requested shared memory size overflows size_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks. I will try with a more sensible value of wal_buffers.. I was hoping to keep more in memory and therefore reduce the frequency of disk IOs..

Any suggestions for good monitoring software for linux?

On 15/06/2010 00:08, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Tom Wilcox<hungrytom@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
maintenance_work_mem=4GB
work_mem=4GB
shared_buffers=4GB
effective_cache_size=4GB
wal_buffers=1GB
It's pretty easy to drive your system into swap with such a large
value for work_mem - you'd better monitor that carefully.

The default value for wal_buffers is 64kB.  I can't imagine why you'd
need to increase that by four orders of magnitude.  I'm not sure
whether it will cause you a problem or not, but you're allocating
quite a lot of shared memory that way that you might not really need.



--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux