Magnus Hagander <magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 21:19, David Jarvis <thangalin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I prefer to_timestamp and to_date over the more verbose construct_timestamp. > Yeah, I agree with that. Those names are already taken. It will cause confusion (of both people and machines) if you try to overload them with this. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
