you are right..the word "zone" was replaced by "area" (my bad )
everything else is as is.
Apologies for the confusion.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Anj Adu <fotographs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Attached
>
> Hmm. Well, I'm not quite sure what's going on here, but I think you
> must be using a modified verison of PostgreSQL, because, as Tom
> pointed out upthread, we don't have a data type called "timestamp with
> time area". It would be called "timestamp with time zone".
>
> Can we see the index and table definitions of the relevant tables
> (attached as a text file) and the size of each one (use select
> pg_relation_size('name'))?
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise Postgres Company
>
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
