Hi there,
I have a simple aggregate query: SELECT count("PK_ID") AS "b1" FROM "tbA"
WHERE "PK_ID" > "f1"( 'c1' ), which has the following execution plan:
"Aggregate (cost=2156915.42..2156915.43 rows=1 width=4)"
" -> Seq Scan on "tbA" (cost=0.00..2137634.36 rows=7712423 width=4)"
" Filter: ("PK_ID" > "f1"('c1'::character varying))"
I tried to get the same result with the following query:
SELECT (
SELECT count("PK_ID") AS "b1" FROM "tbA" ) -
(
SELECT count("PK_ID") AS "b1"
FROM "tbA"
WHERE "PK_ID" <= "f1"( 'c1' )
)
with the execution plan:
"Result (cost=248952.95..248952.96 rows=1 width=0)"
" InitPlan"
" -> Aggregate (cost=184772.11..184772.12 rows=1 width=4)"
" -> Seq Scan on "tbA" (cost=0.00..165243.49 rows=7811449
width=4)"
" -> Aggregate (cost=64180.81..64180.82 rows=1 width=4)"
" -> Index Scan using "tbA_pkey" on "tbA" (cost=0.25..63933.24
rows=99026 width=4)"
" Index Cond: ("PK_ID" <= "f1"('c1'::character varying))"
How do you explain the cost is about ten times lower in the 2nd query than
the first ?
TIA,
Sabin
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
