Hi Scott,
Yes, May i know any particular reason for behaving this. Are its looking for any consistency. I havnt got any clear picture here.
Could you Please explain this..
Thanks & Regards
Raghavendra
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Tadipathri Raghu <traghu.dba@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:From what I understand, with fsync on or off the same stuff gets
> Hi All,
>
> Thank you for all the support.
>
> I have noticed one more thing here, that if you turn off the fsync and try
> to run the transaction than its breaking the currnet filenode and generating
> another filenode. Is it true that whenever you turn off or on the fsync the
> filenode will break and create one more on that table.
written. It's just not guaranteed to go out in the right order or
right now, but eventually.
