Tom Lane wrote: > Given that it estimated 1 row out of "words" (quite correctly) and 12264 > rows out of each scan on article_words, you'd think that the join size > estimate would be 12264, which would be off by "only" a factor of 3 from > the true result. Instead it's 23, off by a factor of 200 :-(. > Has anyone every proposed a "learning" query planner? One that eventually clues in to estimate mismatches like this? -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
