* Kevin Grittner (Kevin.Grittner@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > Could some of you please share some info on such scenarios- where
> > you are supporting/designing/developing databases that run into at
> > least a few hundred GBs of data (I know, that is small by todays'
> > standards)?
Just saw this, so figured I'd comment:
tsf=> \l+
List of databases
Name | Owner | Encoding | Collation | Ctype | Access privileges | Size | Tablespace | Description
-----------+----------+----------+-------------+-------------+----------------------------+---------+-------------+---------------------------
beac | postgres | UTF8 | en_US.UTF-8 | en_US.UTF-8 | =Tc/postgres | 1724 GB | pg_default |
Doesn't look very pretty, but the point is that its 1.7TB. There's a
few other smaller databases on that system too. PG handles it quite
well, though this is primairly for data-mining.
Thanks,
Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
