Scott Marlowe escribió: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Scott Marlowe escribió: > >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Carlo Stonebanks > >> <stonec.register@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> > 4) Is this the right PG version for our needs? > >> > >> 8.3 is very stable. Update to the latest. 8.4 seems good, but I've > >> had, and still am having, problems with it crashing in production. > >> Not often, maybe once every couple of months, but just enough that I'm > >> not ready to try and use it there yet. And I can't force the same > >> failure in testing, at least not yet. > > > > uh. Is there a report of the crash somewhere with details, say stack > > traces and such? > > No, the only server that does this is in production as our stats db > and when it happens it usually gets restarted immediately. It does > this about once every two months. Do the PGDG releases have debugging > symbols and what not? I'll see about having a stack trace ready to > run for the next time it does this. You mean the RPMs? Yes, I think Devrim publishes debuginfo packages which you need to install separately. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
