Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eduardo Piombino wrote:
Going to the disk properties (in windows), I just realized it does not have the Write Cache enabled, and it doesn't also allow me to set it up. I've read in google that the lack of ability to turn it on (that is, that the checkbox remains checked after you apply the changes), has to do with the lack of batter backup in the controller (which is default bundle option for embedded EA-200, which is our case).

Regarding actual disk performance, I did some silly tests:
Copied a 496 Mbytes file from a folder to another folder in C: and it took almost 90 secs.
That would be 496MB/90 sec = 5.51MB/sec


I'd suggest http://www.hdtune.com/ as a better way to test transfer speed here across the drive(s).

I think you'll find that your server continues to underperform expectations until you get the battery installed that allows turning the write cache on. A quick look at HP's literature suggests they believe you only need the battery to enable the write-cache if you're using RAID5. That's completely wrong for database use, where you will greatly benefit from it regardless of underlying RAID setup. If you've got an EA-200 but don't have a battery for it to unlock all the features, you're unlikely to find a more cost effect way to improve your system than to buy one.

--
Greg Smith    2ndQuadrant   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  www.2ndQuadrant.com


--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux