Hi
all,
I've just
received this new server:
1 x XEON 5520 Quad
Core w/ HT
8 GB RAM 1066
MHz
16 x SATA II Seagate
Barracuda 7200.12
3ware 9650SE w/
256MB BBU
It will run an
Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Postgres 8.4 dedicated server. Its database will
be getting between 100 and 1000 inserts per second (those are call detail
records of ~300 bytes each) of around 20 clients (voip gateways). Other activity
is mostly read-only and some non time-critical writes generally at off peak
hours.
So
my
first choice was:
2 discs in RAID
1 for OS + pg_xlog partitioned with ext2.
12 discs in RAID 10
for postgres data, sole partition with ext3.
2
spares
My second choice
is:
4 discs in RAID 10
for OS + pg_xlog partitioned with ext2
10 discs in RAID 10
for postgres, ext3
2
spares.
The bbu caché will
be enabled for both raid volumes.
I justified my first
choice in that WAL writes are sequentially and OS pretty much are too, so a
RAID 1 probably would hold ground against a 12 disc RAID 10 with random
writes.
I don't know in
advance if I will manage to gather enough time to try out both setups so I
wanted to know what you guys think of these 2 alternatives. Do you think a
single RAID 1 will become a bottleneck? Feel free to suggest a better setup
I hadn't considered, it would be most welcome.
Pd: any clue if
hdparm works to deactive the disks write cache even if they are behind the
3ware controller?
Regards,
Fernando.
