Hi,
I first suggestion would be to either build the index only on
parcel_id_code or on (parcel_id_code, id).
But I am not sure because I am new in pg:)
cheers,
lefteris
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Richard Neill <rn214@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I'm trying to optimise the speed of some selects with the where condition:
>
> WHERE id =
> (SELECT MAX(id) FROM tbl_sort_report WHERE parcel_id_code='43024')
>
>
> This is relatively slow, taking about 15-20ms, even though I have a joint
> index on both fields:
>
> CREATE INDEX testidx3 ON tbl_sort_report (id, parcel_id_code);
>
>
> So, my question is, is there any way to improve this? I'd expect that an
> index on ( max(id),parcel_id_code ) would be ideal, excepting that
> postgres won't allow that (and such an index probably doesn't make much
> conceptual sense).
>
>
> Explain Analyze is below.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> Here is part of the schema. id is the primary key; parcel_id_code loops from
> 0...99999 and back again every few hours.
>
> fsc_log=> \d tbl_sort_report
> Table "public.tbl_sort_report"
> Column | Type | Modifiers
> ----------------------+--------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
> id | bigint | not null default
> nextval('master_id_seq'::regclass)
> timestamp | timestamp with time zone |
> parcel_id_code | integer |
> (etc)
>
>
>
>
> EXPLAIN ANALYZE (SELECT MAX(id) FROM tbl_sort_report WHERE
> parcel_id_code='43024');
>
> QUERY PLAN
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Result (cost=7.34..7.35 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=17.712..17.714 rows=1
> loops=1)
> InitPlan 1 (returns $0)
> -> Limit (cost=0.00..7.34 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=17.705..17.705
> rows=0 loops=1)
> -> Index Scan Backward using testidx3 on tbl_sort_report
> (cost=0.00..14.67 rows=2 width=8) (actual time=17.700..17.700 rows=0
> loops=1)
> Index Cond: (parcel_id_code = 43024)
> Filter: (id IS NOT NULL)
> Total runtime: 17.786 ms
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
