Carlo Stonebanks <stonec.register@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Inerestingly, the total index size is 148GB, twice that of the table, > which may be an indication of where the performance bottleneck is. Maybe a sign for massive index-bloat? Andreas -- Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds) "If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknown) Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889° -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
