2010/1/4 Keresztury Balázs <balazs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > just a small question: is it normal that PostgreSQL 8.4.1 always uses > sequential scanning on any table when there is a condition having the > constant "current_user"? Of course there is a btree index set on that table, > but the DBMS just doesn't want to utilize it. When I replace current_user to > any string, the planner uses the index normally. > > I can demonstrate it with the following simple query: > > SELECT psz.kotesszam FROM projekt.projektszervezet psz WHERE > psz.felhasznalo_id = current_user; > > Explain analyze: > > "Seq Scan on projektszervezet psz (cost=0.00..255.07 rows=42 width=9)" > " Filter: ((felhasznalo_id)::name = "current_user"())" You've only got 42 rows in that table - PostgreSQL probably thinks a sequential scan will be faster. It might even be right. The thing is, PostgreSQL doesn't know at planning time what the value of current_user() will be, so the plan can't depend on that; the planner just takes its best shot. But if you provide a particular value in the query then it will look at the stats and see what seems to make the most sense for that particular value. So using one of the more commonly-occuring value in the table might produce a sequential scan, while a less common value might lead to an index scan. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
