On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Greg Stark <gsstark@xxxxxxx> wrote: > A word of warning, in my experience the hardest part for changes like > this isn't the executor changes (which in this case wouldn't be far > from easy) but the planner changes to detect when this new plan would > be better. There's also the problem of making the visibility map crash-safe. I think I heard you might have some ideas on that one - has it been discussed on -hackers? ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance