On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Steve Crawford <scrawford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Peter Meszaros wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I use postgresql 8.3.7 as a huge queue. There is a very simple table >> with six columns and two indices, and about 6 million records are >> written into it in every day continously commited every 10 seconds from >> 8 clients. The table stores approximately 120 million records, because a >> cron job daily deletes those ones are older than 20 day. > > You may be an ideal candidate for table partitioning - this is frequently > used for rotating log table maintenance. > > Use a parent table and 20 child tables. Create a new child every day and > drop the 20-day-old table. Table drops are far faster and lower-impact than > delete-from a 120-million row table. Index-bloat is limited to one-day of > inserts and will be eliminated in 20-days. No deletes means no vacuum > requirement on the affected tables. Single tables are limited to about > 6-million records. A clever backup scheme can ignore prior-days' static > child-tables (and you could keep historical-data-dumps off-line for later > use if desired). > > Read up on it here: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/ddl-partitioning.html >From a performance point of view, this is going to be the best option. It might push some complexity though into his queries to invoke constraint exclusion or deal directly with the child partitions. merlin -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
