Am 05.10.2009 um 23:44 schrieb Karl Denninger:
Axel Rau wrote:
Am 05.10.2009 um 20:06 schrieb Karl Denninger:
gjournal, no. ZFS has potential stability issues - I am VERY
interested
in it when those are resolved. It looks good on a test platform
but I'm
unwilling to run it in production; there are both reports of
crashes and
I have been able to crash it under some (admittedly rather extreme)
synthetic loads.
How do you prevent from long running fsck with TB size ufs
partitions?
I had some hope for zfs13 and fbsd 8.0.
Axel
Turn on softupdates. Fsck is deferred and the system comes up almost
instantly even with TB-sized partitions; the fsck then cleans up the
cruft.
Last time, I checked, there was a issue with background-fsck.
I will give it a chance with my new 8.0 box.
Do you have any experience with SSDs w/o BBUed Raidcontroller?
Are they fast enough to ensure flash write out of drive cache at power
failure after fsync ack?
Axel
---
axel.rau@xxxxxxxxx PGP-Key:29E99DD6 +49 151 2300 9283 computing @
chaos claudius
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
