On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 09:37 -0400, Jean-David Beyer wrote: > Robert Haas wrote (in part): > > Also, I'd just like to mention that vi is a much better editor than > > emacs. > That is not my impression. I have used vi from when it first came out (I > used ed before that) until about 1998 when I first installed Linux on one of > my machines and started using emacs. I find that for some tasks involving > global editing, that vi is a lot easier to use. But for most of the things I > do on a regular basis, if find emacs better. So, for me, it is not which is > the better editor, but which is the better editor for the task at hand. Both vi and emacs are obsolete. Bow before the glory of gedit! -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
