astro77 wrote: > Thanks Kevin. I thought about using tsearch2 but I need to be able to select > exact values on other numerical queries and cannot use "contains" queries. You might be able to make use of a custom parser for tsearch2 that creates something like a single "word" for xml fragments like <whatever>1</whatever> which would let you quickly find exact matches for those words/phrases. > It's got to be fast so I cannot have lots of records returned and have to do > secondary processing on the xml for the records which contain the exact > value I'm looking for. This is one of the reasons I moved from using Lucene > for searching. I hope this makes sense. > > > Kevin Grittner wrote: >> wrote: >> >> >> I would try to minimize how many XML values it had to read, parse, and >> search. The best approach that comes to mind would be to use tsearch2 >> techniques (with a GIN or GiST index on the tsvector) to identify >> which rows contain 'fdc3da1f-060f-4c34-9c30-d9334d9272ae', and use AND >> to combine that with your xpath search. >> >> -Kevin >> >> >> > -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
