* Heikki Linnakangas (heikki.linnakangas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > That's what the OP really should've complained about. If we addressed > that, so that a generic plan was created that determines which child > tables can be excluded at run time, there would be no need for the > persistent plan cache. This would definitely be nice to have.. I'm not sure what the level of difficulty to do it is though. Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
