On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Jason Tesser <jasontesser@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > OK so in my case I have a Person, Email, Phone and Address table. I want to > return the Person and an Array of the others. so my return type would be > something like Person, Email[], Phone[], Address[] > > When passed a personId. > > Are you saying this is better in a view. Create a view that can return that > as oppessed to 1. defining a type for a function to return or 2. a function > that returns 4 out parameters (Person, Address[] ,....) if you are using 8.3+ and are wiling to make a composite type: create table person_t(email text, phone text, address text); select person_id, array_agg((email, phone, address)::person_t) from person group by 1; or, detail fields are in another table: select person_id, (select array(select (email, phone, address)::person_t) from detail where person_id = p.person_id) from person_t; merlin -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance