Oh I just noticed his graphic is "values per second" but he had originally said they were 16 bit values. Even if they were 32 or 64 bit values, I'd expect way more than what he's getting there. On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Scott Marlowe<scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, from the article, I got the feeling he never showed up here on > the list to ask for help, and he just assumed he knew enough about > postgresql to say it couldn't scale well. I just checked the > archives, and his name doesn't show up. > > When you look at his slides, this one makes we wonder about a few points: > > http://deliveryimages.acm.org/10.1145/1540000/1536632/figs/f3.jpg > -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
