Greg Stark <gsstark@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I suspect if this was a problem the zlib people would have added > internal buffering ages ago. I find it hard to believe we're not the > first application to use it this way. I think that most uses of this library are on entire files or streams. They may have felt that adding another layer of buffering would just hurt performance for the typical use case, and anyone using it in some other way could always use their own buffering layer. In Java adding that layer took 30 characters of code, so it didn't make a very big impression on me -- it took a while to even remember I'd had to do it. -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
