2009/7/21 Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Doug Hunley<doug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Just wondering is the issue referenced in >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-11/msg00415.php >> is still present in 8.4 or if some tunable (or other) made the use of >> hyperthreading a non-issue. We're looking to upgrade our servers soon >> for performance reasons and am trying to determine if more cpus (no >> HT) or less cpus (with HT) are the way to go. Thx > > I wouldn't recommend HT CPUs at all. I think your assumption, that HT > == CPU is wrong in first place. Not sure the OP said that... -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance