Scara Maccai <m_lists@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Be sure to include an ORDER BY clause. > Isn't it going to be much slower? It might be; you'd have to test to know for sure. > The important thing is that most of the records are stored "close" > enough one to the other in the right order. Then, yeah, it might not be worth the cost of sorting. -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
