Hi Scott,
This is what I have got -
In Greenplum, the following query returns:
test_db1=# select version();
version
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 8.2.13 (Greenplum Database 3.3.0.1 build 4) on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-44) compiled on Jun 4 2009 16:30:49
(1 row)
In Postgres, the same query returns:
postgres=# select version();
version
-----------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 8.3.7, compiled by Visual C++ build 1400
(1 row)
Regards,
Suvankar Roy
Tata Consultancy Services
Ph:- +91 33 66367352
Cell:- +91 9434666898
| Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx>
07/15/2009 09:10 AM |
|
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Suvankar Roy<suvankar.roy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have some 99,000 records in a table (OBSERVATION_ALL) in a Postgres DB as
> well as a Greenplum DB.
>
> The Primary key is a composite one comprising of 2 columns (so_no,
> serial_no).
>
> The execution of the following query takes 8214.016 ms in Greenplum but only
> 729.134 ms in Postgres.
> select * from observation_all order by so_no, serial_no;
>
> I believe that execution time in greenplum should be less compared to
> postgres. Can anybody throw some light, it would be of great help.
What versions are you comparing?
ForwardSourceID:NT00004AAE
=====-----=====-----===== Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you
